Window tint violations require a stop to verify. \u201cBut the Supreme Court has said that \u2018[t]o be reasonable is not to be perfect, and so the Fourth Amendment allows for some mistakes on the part of government officials, giving them fair leeway for enforcing the law in the community’s protection.\u2019 Heien, 574 U.S. at 60-61 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). \u2018The limit is that the mistakes must be those of reasonable men.\u2019 Id. at 61 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). [\u00b6] The court concludes that Budden’s mistake was that of a reasonable man.\u201d United States v. Ochoa, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91175 (E.D. N.C. May 13, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Nexus was established between the facts known by the police in the investigation of a robbery and defendant\u2019s home. He fled there afterward. The CI\u2019s tip led the police to defendant and his home and observations corroborated the information. United States v. Freeman, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91508 (W.D. Tenn. May 13, 2021),* adopted 021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92411 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant who crashed his car in flight from the police and fled from it leaving it running abandoned it and had no reasonable expectation of privacy in it. United States v. Aron, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91483 (N.D. Ind. May 13, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Window tint violations require a stop to verify. \u201cBut the Supreme Court has said that \u2018[t]o be reasonable is not to be perfect, and so the Fourth Amendment allows for some mistakes on the part of government officials, giving them … Continue reading