{"id":48254,"date":"2021-04-28T14:37:21","date_gmt":"2021-04-28T19:37:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=48254"},"modified":"2021-04-28T14:37:21","modified_gmt":"2021-04-28T19:37:21","slug":"de-def-had-no-standing-to-complain-where-govt-actor-entered-neighbors-property-to-look-at-his","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=48254","title":{"rendered":"DE: Def had no standing to complain where govt actor entered neighbor&#8217;s property to look at his"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Plaintiff had no standing to challenge a government actor\u2019s entry into his neighbor\u2019s property to look at his. <a href=\"https:\/\/courts.delaware.gov\/Opinions\/Download.aspx?id=319500\">McCafferty v. New Castle County Bd. of License<\/a>, 2021 Del. Super. LEXIS 343 (Apr. 26, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>No matter how the court views this habeas petitioner\u2019s Fourth Amendment claim which is by all accounts defaulted, he would lose on the merits. The search was valid under the automobile exception. Taylor v. Jaime, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78917 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bivens would not be extended to claims of falsification and destruction of evidence, including an intertwined Fourth Amendment claim. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ca4.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/192285.P.pdf\">Annappareddy v. Pascale<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 12342 (4th Cir. Apr. 26, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The acts were innocent in themselves, not collectively. Reasonable suspicion shown. United States v. Yang, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79294 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 26, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There was probable cause and nexus, and the good faith exception would apply even if not. United States v. Melendez, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79331 (D. Mass. Apr. 23, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Plaintiff had no standing to challenge a government actor\u2019s entry into his neighbor\u2019s property to look at his. McCafferty v. New Castle County Bd. of License, 2021 Del. Super. LEXIS 343 (Apr. 26, 2021). No matter how the court views &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=48254\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45,35,34,132],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-45","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-standing","category-unreasonable-application--2254d"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=48254"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48254\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48255,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48254\/revisions\/48255"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=48254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=48254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=48254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}