There were 12 robberies and officers got cell tower dumps to attempt to figure out the phone involved. Cell tower dumps did not require a search warrant. United States v. Rhodes, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75184 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 20, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The omitted information in the search warrant application \u201cis not so self-evidently important that Special Agent Singleton’s failure to include it objectively shows a lack of \u2018good faith under all the circumstances.\u2019\u201d Franks challenge denied. The warrant was also particular enough: \u201cThat these categories may, as a whole, encompass a significant volume of information does not mean Defendant’s warrant is insufficiently particular.\u201d United States v. Addaquay, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75185 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 19, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Entry into defendant\u2019s home in hot pursuit was valid. United States v. Stevens, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75237 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 30, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
There were 12 robberies and officers got cell tower dumps to attempt to figure out the phone involved. Cell tower dumps did not require a search warrant. United States v. Rhodes, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75184 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 20, … Continue reading