Defendant\u2019s argument responding to his detention order that there are significant potentially \u201cdispositive\u201d Fourth Amendment issues falls on deaf ears. United States v. Silguero, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72565 (D.N.M. Apr. 15, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rodriguez complied with: \u201cThe information that Kilpela developed during the ordinary incidents of the traffic stop was more than sufficient to provide reasonable suspicion that Sanchez was involved in drug trafficking.\u201d United States v. Sanchez<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 10761 (9th Cir. Apr. 15, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n Defendant\u2019s Franks proffer failed. There were 17 paragraphs of probable cause, and the challenged portion, removed from the affidavit, doesn\u2019t undermine the probable cause. State v. Thorpe<\/a>, 2021-Ohio-1295 (8th Dist. Apr. 14, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant\u2019s argument responding to his detention order that there are significant potentially \u201cdispositive\u201d Fourth Amendment issues falls on deaf ears. United States v. Silguero, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72565 (D.N.M. Apr. 15, 2021).* Rodriguez complied with: \u201cThe information that Kilpela … Continue reading