The military search of defendant\u2019s electronic devices was reasonable and done under a valid search authorization. The fact they were in his room did not prohibit entry to retrieve them. United States v. Basey, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70988 (D. Alaska Apr. 13, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cAs to Mr. Taylor’s Fourth Amendment claim, the jurisdiction of the Claims Court \u2018is limited to cases in which the Constitution or a federal statute requires the payment of money damages as compensation for their violation.\u2019 Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (emphasis added). Because \u2018the Fourth Amendment does not mandate the payment of money for its violation,\u2019 the Claims Court does not have jurisdiction over Fourth Amendment claims. Id.\u201d Taylor v. United States<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 10504 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 13, 2021).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The military search of defendant\u2019s electronic devices was reasonable and done under a valid search authorization. The fact they were in his room did not prohibit entry to retrieve them. United States v. Basey, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70988 (D. … Continue reading