\u201cUnder these circumstances, I find the 911 call contained sufficient indicia of reliability to support Carpenter’s belief in the facts alleged by the caller. Thus, Carpenter was justified in believing there was a man named Dominic, who owned a gun, and was attempting to steal the caller’s car at the address provided, all of which strongly supports a reasonable belief that the individual he encountered minutes later was engaged in criminal activity.\u201d United States v. Wright, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47583 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 15, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cIn isolation, not all of these facts would necessarily justify a Terry stop. But the court finds that in the aggregate they gave rise to the officers’ reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot.\u201d Moreover, \u201cthe officers reasonably relied in objective good faith on the computer records showing Defendant’s outstanding warrants. The court concludes that the officers’ conduct was not \u2018sufficiently deliberate\u2019 that exclusion could meaningfully deter it, and was not \u2018culpable\u2019 in any sense that would warrant deterrence in the first place. See Herring, 129 S. Ct. at 702.\u201d United States v. Walker, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47011 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cUnder these circumstances, I find the 911 call contained sufficient indicia of reliability to support Carpenter’s belief in the facts alleged by the caller. Thus, Carpenter was justified in believing there was a man named Dominic, who owned a gun, … Continue reading