Running wants or warrants on a sex offender involved in a stop didn\u2019t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. McCowan, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6500 (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The affidavit for the search warrant shows probable cause. \u201cEven if the affidavit did not establish probable cause, it is undisputed that the officers searched the residence only after securing a search warrant issued by Judge Hughes. The Defendant does not argue that the officers’ reliance on the warrant was so objectively unreasonable as to warrant suppression of any evidence subsequently seized\u201d under Leon. United States v. Upshaw, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6165 (M.D. Ala. Jan. 13, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant fails in his PCR to show that defense counsel was ineffective for not raising a Gerstein unlawful detention claim. He can\u2019t show that a Gerstein claim has anything to do with his conviction. McKaughan v. State<\/a>, 2021 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 21 (Jan. 13, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Running wants or warrants on a sex offender involved in a stop didn\u2019t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. McCowan, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6500 (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2021).* The affidavit for the search warrant shows probable cause. … Continue reading