Failure to tell the target of a search warrant or his lawyer who showed up what\u2019s being seized by showing the warrant itself doesn\u2019t justify applying the exclusionary rule. The attachments incorporated into the affidavit were present at the scene of the search, and this was not a general search. United States v. Jackson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104 (D. V.I. Jan. 4, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant waived his search issue by pleading guilty, and based on all that\u2019s in the record, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched so he\u2019d lose on the merits. Woods v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 4, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Failure to tell the target of a search warrant or his lawyer who showed up what\u2019s being seized by showing the warrant itself doesn\u2019t justify applying the exclusionary rule. The attachments incorporated into the affidavit were present at the scene … Continue reading