{"id":46600,"date":"2020-12-29T09:25:48","date_gmt":"2020-12-29T14:25:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=46600"},"modified":"2020-12-29T13:52:52","modified_gmt":"2020-12-29T18:52:52","slug":"oh12-rs-for-stop-after-drugs-found-in-70-other-traffic-stops-leaving-house","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=46600","title":{"rendered":"OH12: RS for stop after drugs found in 70 other traffic stops leaving suspected drug house"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Suppose just for the sake of argument a law enforcement officer conducts 70 potentially legal stops of cars leaving a drug house but then finds drugs in the car. Assume further there was no reasonable suspicion for a detention or probable cause for a search. Suppose further the officer finds drugs nearly 100% of the time. Few of them are arrested to keep the investigation on the down low. Then the officer gets a search warrant for the house they were all leaving based on all the drugs coming out of there. Does the target of the search in the house have standing for a motion to suppress on how the probable cause was developed? Almost certainly not, and see \u00a7 4.17 on target standing. But would a potential Rochin due process \u201cshocking to the conscience\u201d claim be viable? Probably not, because the target wasn\u2019t the victim of the conscious shocking police work. This might be suggested by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/12\/2020\/2020-Ohio-6903.pdf\">State v. Hinkston<\/a>, 2020-Ohio-6903, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4720 (12th Dist. Dec. 28, 2020), although these aren\u2019t the facts. There,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>Officer Herren testified that prior to the traffic stop in this case, there had been &#8220;70 some&#8221; different traffic stops where drugs were retrieved from automobiles after leaving the house he was surveilling. He also testified that the house was confirmed as a drug house when controlled buys were conducted by the drug unit. A search warrant was conducted and ultimately the owner was federally indicted on drug charges. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Note the controlled buys alone are clearly enough for probable cause for the house.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The defendant in this case was the driver of one of the cars, and there was easily reasonable suspicion to detain him from facts developing just as the stop occurred.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But, should there be an \u201cends doesn&#8217;t justifies the means\u201d basis for the exclusionary rule? 70 potential Fourth Amendment violations to get a search warrant for yet another person? Is it government&#8217;s place to violate the rights of many to prosecute one? See \u00a7 4.04. There is no ready answer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Suppose just for the sake of argument a law enforcement officer conducts 70 potentially legal stops of cars leaving a drug house but then finds drugs in the car. Assume further there was no reasonable suspicion for a detention or &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=46600\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,35,63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46600","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusionary-rule","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-reasonableness"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=46600"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46600\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":46619,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46600\/revisions\/46619"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=46600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=46600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=46600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}