{"id":46274,"date":"2020-11-28T00:01:09","date_gmt":"2020-11-28T05:01:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=46274"},"modified":"2020-11-26T11:09:28","modified_gmt":"2020-11-26T16:09:28","slug":"ca9-changing-allegedly-offending-officer-in-franks-challenge-on-appeal-was-waiver","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=46274","title":{"rendered":"CA9: Changing allegedly offending officer in <em>Franks<\/em> challenge on appeal was waiver"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Defendant\u2019s Franks challenge to one officer\u2019s alleged misstatements were changed on appeal to involve another officer. This was waiver. <a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/memoranda\/2020\/11\/25\/19-50033.pdf\">United States v. Arnold<\/a>, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 37199 (9th Cir. Nov. 25, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the college admissions scam case, \u201cHere, the Court finds no reason to impose the extraordinary remedy of blanket suppression with respect to the search and seizure of documents contained within Wilson&#8217;s email account because Wilson has not shown that the government&#8217;s conduct reflects a deliberate, reckless or grossly negligent disregard for the Fourth Amendment. Indeed, in executing the warrant, agents of the government implemented reasonable measures to ensure their compliance with the warrant to the best of their ability.\u201d United States v. Wilson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221300 (D. Mass. Nov. 25, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s Franks challenge to one officer\u2019s alleged misstatements were changed on appeal to involve another officer. This was waiver. United States v. Arnold, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 37199 (9th Cir. Nov. 25, 2020). In the college admissions scam case, \u201cHere, &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=46274\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,21,129],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusionary-rule","category-franks-doctrine","category-waiver"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=46274"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46274\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":46275,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46274\/revisions\/46275"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=46274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=46274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=46274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}