Defendant\u2019s arrest under the Cleveland Mayor\u2019s civil unrest proclamation was unreasonable, and the plain view was a result of the illegal arrest. United States v. Long, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213676 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Petitioner generally claimed the affidavit for the search warrant in his case was insufficient to support an ineffective assistance claim. Defense counsel\u2019s failure to file a motion to suppress isn\u2019t per se ineffective assistance because there could be good reason not to. Slates v. United States, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 35820 (6th Cir. Nov. 13, 2020).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The CI\u2019s information started with \u201creliability\u201d buys and then surveillance to back it up. There was probable cause and the good faith exception applies. United States v. Mitchell, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213682 (W.D. Tenn. Nov. 16, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s arrest under the Cleveland Mayor\u2019s civil unrest proclamation was unreasonable, and the plain view was a result of the illegal arrest. United States v. Long, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213676 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 16, 2020). Petitioner generally claimed the … Continue reading