Defendant\u2019s going from and back to his house after drug deals showed nexus to the house for a search warrant. United States v. Jaqu, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183603 (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff\u2019s claim that he should have been arrested sooner in violation of city policy didn\u2019t cite to the record to show it had been raised below. Moya v. City of Clovis<\/a>, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 31579 (10th Cir. Oct. 5, 2020).* [There’s no constitutional right to be arrested earlier than you were.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Defendant didn\u2019t raise plain error to overcome his waiver (or forfeiture) of his Fourth Amendment claim. United States v. Ockert<\/a>, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 31581 (10th Cir. Oct. 5, 2020).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n Defendant\u2019s consent was voluntary. United States v. Derrick, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184176 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 5, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant\u2019s going from and back to his house after drug deals showed nexus to the house for a search warrant. United States v. Jaqu, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183603 (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2020). Plaintiff\u2019s claim that he should have been … Continue reading