The information for the search warrant was not stale: \u201cIn this light, the information about child abuse was not stale. Indeed, the character of the alleged crime\u2014abuse of a child\u2014was grounds for continuing concern.\u201d As to continuing a traffic stop: \u201cUnder the circumstances here, the officers had both reasonable suspicion and statutory grounds for extending the stop.\u201d United States v. Rashid, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157281 (S.D. Ohio. Aug. 31, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
An internet service provider viewed one image of child pornography which was a private search and the government saw that image. The government also saw another image that wasn\u2019t subject to the private search. No matter because the first was enough to show probable cause. United States v. Wilbert<\/a>, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 27578 (2d Cir. Aug. 28, 2020).* The information for the search warrant was not stale: \u201cIn this light, the information about child abuse was not stale. Indeed, the character of the alleged crime\u2014abuse of a child\u2014was grounds for continuing concern.\u201d As to continuing a traffic stop: … Continue reading
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"