{"id":44895,"date":"2020-08-11T08:07:45","date_gmt":"2020-08-11T13:07:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=44895"},"modified":"2020-08-11T10:22:17","modified_gmt":"2020-08-11T15:22:17","slug":"ca9-it-was-well-established-that-presence-in-the-u-s-was-not-a-crime-so-ptfs-arrest-was-unreasonable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=44895","title":{"rendered":"CA9: It was well established that &#8220;illegal presence&#8221; in the U.S. was not a crime, so ptf&#8217;s arrest was unreasonable"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Illegal entry is a crime, but not mere presence, and that was well established since 2012. Defendant\u2019s arrest  of plaintiff  in a courtroom as a witness on suspicion of being here illegally at the request of a JP was unreasonable. <a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2020\/08\/10\/19-35513.pdf\">Hernandez v. Skinner<\/a>, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 25183 (9th Cir. Aug. 10, 2020).*  Summary by the court:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>The panel first noted that, unlike illegal entry into the United States\u2014which is a crime under 8 U.S.C. \u00a7 1325\u2014illegal presence is not a crime. See Martinez-Medina, 673 F.3d 1029, 1036 (9th Cir. 2011). Therefore, &#8220;because mere unauthorized presence is not a criminal matter, suspicion of unauthorized presence alone does not give rise to an inference that criminal activity is afoot.&#8221; Melendres v. Arpaio, 695 F.3d 990, 1001 (9th Cir. 2012). Because Melendres and Martinez-Medina controlled and defendant Skinner failed to demonstrate that he had a particularized and objective basis for believing criminal activity was afoot, the panel affirmed the district court&#8217;s holding that Skinner violated the Fourth Amendment when he seized plaintiff by Terry-stopping and then arresting him without reasonable suspicion or probable cause, respectively.<\/p><p>The panel further held that under either the proximate or the but-for standard of causation, defendant Hernandez was an integral participant in the violation of plaintiff&#8217;s constitutional rights. The panel held that plaintiff&#8217;s right to be free from unlawful stops in this circumstance had been established since at least 2012, by which time both Melendres and Martinez-Medina were law of the circuit.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Bloomberg Law: <a href=\"https:\/\/news.bloomberglaw.com\/white-collar-and-criminal-law\/witness-seized-on-immigration-suspicions-can-pursue-lawsuit\">Witness Seized on Immigration Suspicions Can Pursue Lawsuit<\/a> by Brian Flood (&#8220;A man who was arrested at a Billings, Mont., courthouse after another witness testified he wasn\u2019t in the U.S. legally can pursue his Fourth Amendment case against the officials responsible, because the Ninth Circuit said.&#8221;)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Illegal entry is a crime, but not mere presence, and that was well established since 2012. Defendant\u2019s arrest of plaintiff in a courtroom as a witness on suspicion of being here illegally at the request of a JP was unreasonable. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=44895\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[107,40,63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44895","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-immigration-arrests","category-qualified-immunity","category-reasonableness"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44895","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=44895"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44895\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44904,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44895\/revisions\/44904"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=44895"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=44895"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=44895"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}