{"id":44528,"date":"2020-07-15T11:25:19","date_gmt":"2020-07-15T16:25:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=44528"},"modified":"2020-07-15T11:25:19","modified_gmt":"2020-07-15T16:25:19","slug":"n-d-ohio-mere-desire-to-cross-examine-about-the-drug-dogs-bona-fides-isnt-a-franks-issue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=44528","title":{"rendered":"N.D.Ohio: Mere desire to cross-examine about the drug dog&#8217;s bona fides isn&#8217;t a <em>Franks<\/em> issue"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Merely wanting to cross-examine about the reliability of the drug dog isn\u2019t a Franks challenge. There still has to be a \u201csubstantial preliminary showing\u201d of a falsity, and desire to cross-examine isn\u2019t it. United States v. Robinson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122441 (N.D. Ohio July 13, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThough \u2018a \u201cman&#8217;s house is his castle,\u201d\u2019 Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 596 (1980), not all castles are impenetrable. Under the Fourth Amendment, officers do not need a Trojan Horse or a trebuchet to breach a citizen&#8217;s home\u2014all they need is a warrant supported by probable cause. This case presents the question whether officers had probable cause to search Frederick Jenkins&#8217;s home upon learning that the State of Oklahoma was currently prosecuting him for serious drug crimes and upon finding a small baggie with methamphetamine residue among the trash left for disposal on the street outside his house. We hold that together these factors provided the warrant-issuing judge with a substantial basis to conclude that the officers had probable cause.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ca10.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/19\/19-6014.pdf\">United States v. Jenkins<\/a>, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 21390 (10th Cir. July 10, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Merely wanting to cross-examine about the reliability of the drug dog isn\u2019t a Franks challenge. There still has to be a \u201csubstantial preliminary showing\u201d of a falsity, and desire to cross-examine isn\u2019t it. United States v. Robinson, 2020 U.S. Dist. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=44528\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-franks-doctrine","category-probable-cause"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=44528"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44528\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44529,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44528\/revisions\/44529"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=44528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=44528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=44528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}