Fourth Amendment claim made in motion for new trial is denied without prejudice to litigate it in a post-conviction proceeding. State v. Bell, 2020 Iowa App. LEXIS 521 (May 13, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress for lack of probable cause or nexus. That which is available to the court in the file shows there was both. Therefore, defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective. United States v. Allen, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84134 (E.D. Mich. May 13, 2020).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kansas law allows local officials to access cell phone records in other states. Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not challenging that. United States v. Valerius, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84915 (D. Kan. May 14, 2020).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Fourth Amendment claim made in motion for new trial is denied without prejudice to litigate it in a post-conviction proceeding. State v. Bell, 2020 Iowa App. LEXIS 521 (May 13, 2020). Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not pursuing a motion … Continue reading