There is no per se staleness. A new warrant for defendant\u2019s DNA alleging it was previously drawn in 2005 and 2007 and matched wasn\u2019t stale. How does DNA change? It doesn\u2019t. United States v. Williams, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38735 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 13, 2020), adopted, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38430 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 4, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
CSLI information obtained under a search warrant is reviewed under the same standard of review of any warrant, and, even if there was no probable cause, there is nothing but good faith here. United States v. Johnson<\/a>, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 7021 (2d Cir. Mar. 6, 2020). Plaintiff stated a claim that overcame qualified immunity for the police shooting death of her mentally disturbed son who wasn\u2019t posing a sufficient threat to justify it. Crowder v. City of Manila<\/a>, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 7026 (8th Cir. Mar. 6, 2020).* There is no per se staleness. A new warrant for defendant\u2019s DNA alleging it was previously drawn in 2005 and 2007 and matched wasn\u2019t stale. How does DNA change? It doesn\u2019t. United States v. Williams, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38735 … Continue reading
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"