Defendant was observed doing four controlled buys, and he went back to his girlfriend\u2019s house in her car each time. \u201cDefendant contends that the affidavit lacked probable cause because it did not state who owned the Residence, whether Defendant lived at the Residence, or whether Defendant had a long-term connection to the Residence. Such statements are not required for an affidavit supporting a search warrant. The affidavit is not required to have direct evidence linking a crime to a particular place. See Zamudio, 909 F.3d at 175.\u201d United States v. Douglas, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6350 (C.D. Ill. Jan. 8, 2020).<\/p>\n
Tribal officers are authorized to make arrests of non-Indians on tribal lands for criminal offenses. Duro v. Reina, 495 U.S. 676, 697 (1990). State v. Thompson<\/a>, 2020 Minn. LEXIS 4 (Jan. 15, 2020).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant was observed doing four controlled buys, and he went back to his girlfriend\u2019s house in her car each time. \u201cDefendant contends that the affidavit lacked probable cause because it did not state who owned the Residence, whether Defendant lived … Continue reading