Defendant\u2019s furtive movements while driving and nervousness after the stop justified extending the stop for fear there might be a weapon. United States v. Miller, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224424 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 4, 2019).*<\/p>\n
The odor of alcohol, fumbling with paperwork, and failing the FST was reasonable suspicion to extend the stop and then probable cause for arrest. State v. Murray<\/a>, 2020-Ohio-45, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 38 (2d Dist. Jan. 10, 2020).*<\/p>\n Reversed again for lack of a hearing and findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court remanded once, Peterson v. State, 249 So. 3d 1264, 1264-65 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018), and it does so again. Peterson v. State<\/a>, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 249 (Fla. 5th DCA Jan. 10, 2020).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant\u2019s furtive movements while driving and nervousness after the stop justified extending the stop for fear there might be a weapon. United States v. Miller, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224424 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 4, 2019).* The odor of alcohol, fumbling … Continue reading