Once officers had a warrant authorizing capturing defendant\u2019s cell phone pings back even in 2015, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his movements in public when they were following him based on the result of the pings. Therefore, defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not challenging that, too. United States v. Bummer, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1052 (D. Mont. Jan. 5, 2020).<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s computer was passing information out from it, including child pornography, and, thus, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the computer when the government gathered that information. United States v. Sigouin, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223695 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 19, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Once officers had a warrant authorizing capturing defendant\u2019s cell phone pings back even in 2015, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his movements in public when they were following him based on the result of the pings. Therefore, … Continue reading