{"id":41506,"date":"2019-12-28T09:14:04","date_gmt":"2019-12-28T14:14:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=41506"},"modified":"2019-12-28T09:14:04","modified_gmt":"2019-12-28T14:14:04","slug":"s-d-n-y-alleged-violation-of-florida-law-by-defs-arrest-there-where-local-officer-assisted-federal-officers-wasnt-a-4a-violation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=41506","title":{"rendered":"S.D.N.Y.: Alleged violation of Florida law by def&#8217;s arrest there where local officer assisted federal officers wasn&#8217;t a 4A violation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An alleged violation of Florida law in defendant\u2019s arrest there with the participation of local law enforcement isn\u2019t shown to be a Fourth Amendment violation. \u201cAnd Teman has not cited any authority so holding or, for that matter, treating such a state-law violation as breaching any other provision of the federal Constitution. Second, the inevitable discovery exception to the Fourth Amendment&#8217;s exclusionary rule would firmly apply here to the evidence seized incident to Teman&#8217;s arrest, given that federal officers clearly would have lawfully obtained such evidence without Alessandrino\u2014they had obtained a valid federal warrant and were present to effectuate Teman&#8217;s arrest pursuant to that warrant. &#8230; Third, Teman has not alleged facts making Detective Alessandrino&#8217;s participation in the arrest alongside federal law enforcement officers, if a violation at all of Florida law, anything other than a good faith violation. Absent a factual basis to find otherwise, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule &#8230;, would apply here.\u201d United States v. Teman, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220053 (S.D. N.Y. Dec. 20, 2019).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An alleged violation of Florida law in defendant\u2019s arrest there with the participation of local law enforcement isn\u2019t shown to be a Fourth Amendment violation. \u201cAnd Teman has not cited any authority so holding or, for that matter, treating such &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=41506\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[95,63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conflict-of-laws","category-reasonableness"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=41506"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41506\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41507,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41506\/revisions\/41507"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=41506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=41506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=41506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}