Defendant filed a \u201claundry list\u201d 2255. His Franks IAC claim is rejected for lack of any offer of proof that it would remotely be granted. Johnson v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216544 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 17, 2019).*<\/p>\n
The officer testified that defendant crossed the centerline twice, and defendant admitted the vehicle pulled left. The trial court credited that, and it\u2019s enough for a stop in Ohio. State v. Worstell<\/a>, 2019-Ohio-5228, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 5292 (5th Dist. Dec. 16, 2019).*<\/p>\n Defense counsel was not ineffective for not moving to suppress the basis for the stop. There was reasonable suspicion for the stop. State v. Kelly<\/a>, 2019-Ohio-5226, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 5289 (5th Dist. Dec. 17, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant filed a \u201claundry list\u201d 2255. His Franks IAC claim is rejected for lack of any offer of proof that it would remotely be granted. Johnson v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216544 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 17, 2019).* The … Continue reading