{"id":41338,"date":"2019-12-22T18:45:59","date_gmt":"2019-12-22T23:45:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=41338"},"modified":"2019-12-22T18:52:40","modified_gmt":"2019-12-22T23:52:40","slug":"ia-std-of-review-of-pc-is-not-is-there-pc-but-is-there-a-substantial-basis-for-believing-there-was-pc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=41338","title":{"rendered":"IA: Std of review of PC is not is there PC, but is there a substantial basis for believing there was PC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cBecause the Fourth Amendment values the practice of obtaining a warrant to reduce the perception of intrusive police conduct, we do not strictly scrutinize the sufficiency of the underlying affidavit. &#8230; Instead, we decide whether the issuing magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding probable cause existed. Id. [\u00b6] Here, we find those common-sense inferences would lead a reasonably prudent person to believe evidence of a crime may have been found at Michael&#8217;s house.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iowacourts.gov\/courtcases\/8137\/embed\/CourtAppealsOpinion\">State v. Syperda<\/a>, 2019 Iowa App. LEXIS 1159 (Dec. 18, 2019).*<\/p>\n<p>The body cam video showed that the person with apparent authority consented to the search on the totality. It started out as a welfare check. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iowacourts.gov\/courtcases\/7867\/embed\/CourtAppealsOpinion\">State v. Rutter<\/a>, 2019 Iowa App. LEXIS 1130 (Dec. 18, 2019).*<\/p>\n<p>The dash cam video shows defendant driving half the speed limit and swerving within his lane. The officer had reasonable suspicion for the stop. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iowacourts.gov\/courtcases\/8356\/embed\/CourtAppealsOpinion\">State v. Bertrand<\/a>, 2019 Iowa App. LEXIS 1137 (Dec. 18, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cBecause the Fourth Amendment values the practice of obtaining a warrant to reduce the perception of intrusive police conduct, we do not strictly scrutinize the sufficiency of the underlying affidavit. &#8230; Instead, we decide whether the issuing magistrate had a &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=41338\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30,35,96],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apparent-authority-2","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-standards-of-review"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=41338"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41338\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41339,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41338\/revisions\/41339"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=41338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=41338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=41338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}