{"id":40889,"date":"2019-11-30T00:00:03","date_gmt":"2019-11-30T05:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=40889"},"modified":"2019-12-03T09:32:28","modified_gmt":"2019-12-03T14:32:28","slug":"oh8-states-losing-exhibits-from-suppression-hearing-requires-new-trial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=40889","title":{"rendered":"OH8: State&#8217;s losing exhibits from suppression hearing requires new trial"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Appellant appeals the denial of his suppression motion, but a bunch of the exhibits are missing. The state relies on precedent that it\u2019s the appellant\u2019s obligation to bring up a record. The state, however, somehow got Exhibits 1-23 back and now they are missing, and they certified to the court that they looked and can\u2019t find them. The fault for lack of a record isn\u2019t attributable to the defendant. Reversed for a new trial. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/8\/2019\/2019-Ohio-4885.pdf\">State v. Garcia<\/a>, 2019-Ohio-4885, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4928 (8th Dist. Nov. 27, 2019).<\/p>\n<p>The officer\u2019s statement that he\u2019d try to get a search warrant if consent was informative was not coercive. The officer explained the process, and the consent was a free choice. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/8\/2019\/2019-Ohio-4887.pdf\">State v. Mathis<\/a>, 2019-Ohio-4887, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4929 (8th Dist. Nov. 29, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Appellant appeals the denial of his suppression motion, but a bunch of the exhibits are missing. The state relies on precedent that it\u2019s the appellant\u2019s obligation to bring up a record. The state, however, somehow got Exhibits 1-23 back and &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=40889\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,111],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-consent","category-suppression-hearings"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=40889"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40889\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41003,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40889\/revisions\/41003"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=40889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=40889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=40889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}