2255 claim that officer perjured himself during suppression hearing was already raised there and on appeal and barred here. United States v. Brown, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201044 (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2019).*<\/p>\n
Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not pursuing whether defendant\u2019s traffic stop was valid since defendant pled guilty to the traffic ticket. Richardson v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202390 (S.D. W.Va. Nov. 20, 2019).*<\/p>\n
2255 claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not arguing his suppression motion better doesn\u2019t state a ground for relief. The Fourth Amendment claim was raised and lost already and no additional grounds are shown that would change the outcome. United States v. Session, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201344 (N.D. Fla. Oct. 11, 2019).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s 2255 claims that the traffic stop was illegal and counsel was ineffective for not challenging it. It\u2019s undisputed that he was speeding, and the stop was justified, despite his claim of pretext. United States v. Munoz, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201942 (W.D. La. Nov. 19, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
2255 claim that officer perjured himself during suppression hearing was already raised there and on appeal and barred here. United States v. Brown, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201044 (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2019).* Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not pursuing … Continue reading