When defendant was arrested on an arrest warrant, it was constitutionally required that officers have the warrant in hand at the time of the arrest. Rule 4 only requires the warrant be shown as soon as practical. Defendant was arrested on a child support warrant. The search of his bag wasn\u2019t valid as a search incident, but it was as inventory. United States v. Stephens, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183440 (W.D. Va. Oct. 23, 2019).<\/p>\n
Defendant had standing to contest the government\u2019s acquiring geolocation information from a cell phone that defendant was using, claiming it was his phone. The tracking order for him established probable cause he was involved in a drug conspiracy. United States v. Cardona, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183146 (D. Mass. Oct. 23, 2019).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s claim that defense counsel was ineffective in not better challenging the search warrant is moot because nothing from the search was admitted at trial. Williams v. State<\/a>, 2019 Ark. 289, 2019 Ark. LEXIS 294 (Oct. 24, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" When defendant was arrested on an arrest warrant, it was constitutionally required that officers have the warrant in hand at the time of the arrest. Rule 4 only requires the warrant be shown as soon as practical. Defendant was arrested … Continue reading