{"id":399,"date":"2007-02-24T13:37:55","date_gmt":"2006-09-10T11:59:23","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2017-09-17T13:42:05","modified_gmt":"2017-09-17T18:42:05","slug":"en-us-135","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=399","title":{"rendered":"Judge Moylan espouses on the exclusionary rule, post-Hudson"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The uninimitable Judge Moylan of the Maryland Court of Special Appeals held in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.state.md.us\/opinions\/cosa\/2006\/231s06.pdf\">State v. Savage<\/a>, 2006 Md. App. LEXIS 152 (September 8, 2006), that <em>Hudson<\/em> applied to a search occurring before it was decided, and held that there was no exclusionary remedy for a violation of knock and announce.  It is a 75 page opinion exploring the history of knock-and-announce and application of the exclusionary rule which is worth reading [click on case name for a free link] if one has the time.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>After its extensive analysis of the pro&#8217;s and con&#8217;s of the exclusionary rule&#8211;its purpose and its history&#8211;the Supreme Court concluded that, on balance, the exclusion of evidence is too heavy a price to pay for a &#8220;knock and announce&#8221; violation and that there are, moreover, other viable alternatives. <\/p>\n<p>[T]he social costs of applying the exclusionary rule to knock-and-announce violations are considerable; &#8230; the extant deterrents against them are substantial&#8211;incomparably greater than the factors deterring warrantless entries when Mapp was decided. Resort to the massive remedy of suppressing evidence of guilt is unjustified.<\/p>\n<p>165 L. Ed. 2d at 69 (emphasis supplied).<\/p>\n<p>Without an exclusionary rule, there is no way to win a suppression hearing.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Officers had PC to believe that bank robbery suspects were in the place entered without a warrant and based on the consent of the lessee of the apartment they were hiding in.  United States v. Hiley, 201 Fed. Appx. 403 (9th Cir. September 7, 2006)* (unpublished).<\/p>\n<p>Defendant&#8217;s contention he did not understand that officers wanted to seize his computer for forensic evaluation for containing child porn was rejected.  The testimony was hardly in dispute on defendant&#8217;s demeanor and cooperation.  United States v. Miller, 450 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (M.D. Fla. July 6, 2006).*<\/p>\n<p><em>Samson<\/em> does not apply to a probation search of a juvenile in Pennsylvania because it is defined by statute. A search of the juvenile&#8217;s premises who was on probation, but based on his brother&#8217;s probation, was invalid as lacking reasonable suspicion. Appeal of J.E., A Minor, 2006 PA Super 249, 2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2635 (September 8, 2006).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=399\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-399","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/399","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=399"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/399\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29092,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/399\/revisions\/29092"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=399"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=399"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}