The search of defendant\u2019s U-Haul truck was justified by a dog alert. \u201cAssuming arguendo that Third Circuit precedent supported defendants’ more taxing standard for what constitutes a positive and reliable alert, Trooper Hoy still had probable cause to search the U-Haul truck because Canine Tom also indicated to the specific location of the narcotics.\u201d United States v. Xiao Wu Zhou, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130934 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 6, 2019).<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s order for lifetime satellite based monitoring is reversed, knowing that the issue is pending before the state supreme court in other cases. State v. Tucker, 2019 N.C. App. LEXIS 640 (Aug. 6, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The search of defendant\u2019s U-Haul truck was justified by a dog alert. \u201cAssuming arguendo that Third Circuit precedent supported defendants’ more taxing standard for what constitutes a positive and reliable alert, Trooper Hoy still had probable cause to search the … Continue reading