This was not even a traffic stop, although it appeared one to the defendant. Actually, it was based on a CI\u2019s information involving drugs and was with probable cause, so the extension of the stop with reasonable suspicion didn’t even matter. United States v. Wilson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124800 (W.D. Ark. July 24, 2019).<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s motion to suppress a geolocation warrant to Facebook to compare defendant\u2019s car to one seen in a bank robbery video didn\u2019t make a sufficient allegation that it was false to get a Franks hearing. There may have been an error, but nothing shows that it was anything more than negligence at worst. Counsel\u2019s claim at a pretrial that it was made recklessly was speculative. United States v. Prather, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125029 (N.D. Ga. July 11, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This was not even a traffic stop, although it appeared one to the defendant. Actually, it was based on a CI\u2019s information involving drugs and was with probable cause, so the extension of the stop with reasonable suspicion didn’t even … Continue reading