{"id":38310,"date":"2019-06-27T04:31:50","date_gmt":"2019-06-27T09:31:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=38310"},"modified":"2019-06-27T04:31:50","modified_gmt":"2019-06-27T09:31:50","slug":"e-d-n-c-no-iac-in-foregoing-motion-to-suppress-to-tamp-down-more-bad-facts-and-plea-bargain-instead","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=38310","title":{"rendered":"E.D.N.C.: No IAC in foregoing motion to suppress to tamp down more bad facts and plea bargain instead"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Facing a 21 U.S.C. \u00a7 851 enhancement, it was objectively reasonable strategy for defense counsel to forego a doubtful motion to suppress that would dredge up additional bad facts and make plea bargaining harder. Thomas v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106816 (E.D. N.C. June 26, 2019):<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cDefense counsel also made a reasonable strategic decision not to file the motion to suppress. He &#8220;advised [petitioner] that a suppression motion would have a deleterious effect on the outcome of his case.&#8221; (Id. at 2.) As defense counsel explains, he had to look at the &#8220;big picture.&#8221; (Id. at 3-4.) The evidence against petitioner was strong, and petitioner was potentially facing a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 21 U.S.C. \u00a7 851. (Id. at 4.) Defense counsel&#8217;s strategy was to negotiate the best possible plea agreement and put petitioner in the most advantageous position at sentencing, rather than focus on accusations concerning law enforcement officers, which a motion to suppress and any hearing would entail. (See id.) Such a strategy was objectively reasonable, and therefore, counsel was not deficient in failing to file a motion to suppress.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Facing a 21 U.S.C. \u00a7 851 enhancement, it was objectively reasonable strategy for defense counsel to forego a doubtful motion to suppress that would dredge up additional bad facts and make plea bargaining harder. Thomas v. United States, 2019 U.S. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=38310\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ineffective-assistance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=38310"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38310\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38311,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38310\/revisions\/38311"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=38310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=38310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=38310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}