Defense counsel had no duty to raise lack of an arrest warrant for defendant\u2019s arrest because it was frivolous and wouldn\u2019t affect the outcome of the case at all. Brown v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69027 (C.D. Ill. Apr. 23, 2019).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s presence at the execution of a search warrant elsewhere where he had nothing on him was relevant and admissible to RICO overt acts 96 & 98 showing his part in the conspiracy. Actual possession of drugs isn\u2019t required. United States v. Robinson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68462 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 23, 2019).*<\/p>\n
Defendant brought drugs over to a woman\u2019s house. She had the authority to consent to a search of her own place that resulted in seizure of the drugs. State v. Crawford<\/a>, 2019-Ohio-1507, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 1607 (5th Dist. Apr. 23, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defense counsel had no duty to raise lack of an arrest warrant for defendant\u2019s arrest because it was frivolous and wouldn\u2019t affect the outcome of the case at all. Brown v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69027 (C.D. Ill. … Continue reading