{"id":37284,"date":"2019-04-17T09:16:53","date_gmt":"2019-04-17T14:16:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=37284"},"modified":"2019-04-17T09:16:53","modified_gmt":"2019-04-17T14:16:53","slug":"n-d-ga-ip-information-is-not-governed-by-carpenter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=37284","title":{"rendered":"N.D.Ga.: IP information is not governed by <em>Carpenter<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>IP information is not governed by Carpenter. \u201cObtaining information from Kik, Sprint, and Comcast did not allow law enforcement to track Defendant Jenkins&#8217;s physical location over an extended period. At most, it allowed them a lead in identifying him \u2014 giving possible usernames or addresses at which someone communicated with the two young girls.\u201d United States v. Jenkins, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62776 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 12, 2019).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe officers were justified in initially stopping the car for a legitimate civil violation. Also, the officers had probable cause to continue the stop after they smelled marijuana.\u201d Then reasonable suspicion developed for a patdown. United States v. Sleet, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64147 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 15, 2019).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant can\u2019t get back seized property he agreed in his plea agreement would be kept by the state. <a href=\"https:\/\/acis.alabama.gov\/displaydocs.cfm?no=939590&#038;event=5GJ0K8JZV\">Roberts v. State<\/a>, 2019 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 44 (Apr. 15, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>IP information is not governed by Carpenter. \u201cObtaining information from Kik, Sprint, and Comcast did not allow law enforcement to track Defendant Jenkins&#8217;s physical location over an extended period. At most, it allowed them a lead in identifying him \u2014 &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=37284\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,67,79],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37284","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-rule-41g-return-of-property","category-third-party-doctrine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37284","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=37284"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37284\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37285,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37284\/revisions\/37285"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=37284"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=37284"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=37284"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}