A child pornography search warrant for all computer stuff in the house associated with a particular IP address wasn\u2019t directed at defendant\u2013it was for the IP address to identify the potential user. Seizing all computer related stuff in the house wasn\u2019t unreasonable under the warrant. O’Connor v. State, 2019 Alas. App. LEXIS 58 (Apr. 12, 2019).<\/p>\n
\u201cRicks’s claim that Stearns’s affidavit establishes that the government committed fraud on the court when it used the affidavit to improperly obtain a wiretap on his cellular phone does not satisfy the requirements for authorizing him to file a second or successive \u00a7 2255 motion.\u201d It\u2019s not newly discovered. Ricks v. United States, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 10746 (6th Cir. Apr. 11, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A child pornography search warrant for all computer stuff in the house associated with a particular IP address wasn\u2019t directed at defendant\u2013it was for the IP address to identify the potential user. Seizing all computer related stuff in the house … Continue reading