Defendant\u2019s providing a false name was enough for the officer to extend the stop with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Boley, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46935 (N.D. Va. Mar. 21, 2019).<\/p>\n
Revealing the plaintiff\u2019s identity as a CI in a search warrant affidavit resulted in his being shot. That stated a claim for relief under at least state law, and maybe \u00a7 1983 too [but what about qualified immunity]. Corgan v. Keema<\/a>, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 8569 (9th Cir. Mar. 22, 2019).*<\/p>\n Not a search issue but worth noting: Defendant\u2019s home surveillance system caught images of several drug deals and a drug cook. The case doesn\u2019t, however, describe the probable cause for searching the DVR. State v. Groce<\/a>, 2019-Ohio-1007, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 1062 (10th Dist. Mar. 22, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant\u2019s providing a false name was enough for the officer to extend the stop with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Boley, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46935 (N.D. Va. Mar. 21, 2019). Revealing the plaintiff\u2019s identity as a CI in a … Continue reading