\u201cIn this case, Special Agent Dosch, a 22-year veteran of the DEA, submitted a 51-page and 72-page detailed affidavit in support of the search warrants which were based on surveillance, information from confidential informants, financial records, evidence including drug contraband and large amounts of currency obtained through other seizures, drug ledgers, text messages, and other evidence. The agents obtained search warrants, which did not contain false information, were not \u2018bare bones,\u2019 and were not so facially deficient as to render the agents’ reliance upon them to be unreasonable. … Therefore, even if the search warrants were not sufficiently supported by probable cause, the court applies the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule.\u201d United States v. Attisha, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46798 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 21, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cIn this case, Special Agent Dosch, a 22-year veteran of the DEA, submitted a 51-page and 72-page detailed affidavit in support of the search warrants which were based on surveillance, information from confidential informants, financial records, evidence including drug contraband … Continue reading