There is no statutory definition of \u2018normal speed of traffic.\u2019 And, Officer Anderson did not testify that the SUV was driving less than the \u2018normal speed of traffic\u2019 as required by the statute. Rather, he stated that the SUV was going below the speed limit. In articulating the basis for his stop, Officer Anderson conflated \u2018the normal speed of traffic as equal to the posted speed limit. … Because driving below the speed limit is not a statutory violation, that did not provide reasonable suspicion to believe the statute had been violated.\u201d United States v. Martinez-Beltran, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41497 (D. Ariz. Mar. 14, 2019).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s window tint violation supported the stop, and then reasonable suspicion developed. United States v. Detter, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41363 (D. Kan. Mar. 14, 2019).*<\/p>\n
There was probable cause supporting the search warrant for defendant\u2019s property. State v. Perez<\/a>, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 194 (Mar. 14, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" There is no statutory definition of \u2018normal speed of traffic.\u2019 And, Officer Anderson did not testify that the SUV was driving less than the \u2018normal speed of traffic\u2019 as required by the statute. Rather, he stated that the SUV was … Continue reading