Defendant\u2019s stop was reasonable because the LPN didn\u2019t match the vehicle. His reaching in the car to turn off the ignition was not a search. \u201cAs Officer Jenkins was backing out of the vehicle, she looked down and saw what appeared to be a firearm or a firearm holster partially sticking out from under the driver’s seat.\u201d That was a legitimate plain view. United States v. Taylor, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21709 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 11, 2019).<\/p>\n
This is a request for a successor habeas on newly discovered evidence. Defendant\u2019s claim that no search warrant was filed in his district court criminal case number doesn\u2019t mean there wasn\u2019t one. One was filed in a magistrate\u2019s case number for him. Denied. In re Rafidi, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 4168 (6th Cir. Feb. 12, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s stop was reasonable because the LPN didn\u2019t match the vehicle. His reaching in the car to turn off the ignition was not a search. \u201cAs Officer Jenkins was backing out of the vehicle, she looked down and saw what … Continue reading