Defendant disavowed any connection at trial to a particular house as a trial strategy. Thus, it was not ineffective assistance of counsel for not moving to suppress the search of a house he thus lacked standing in\u2013defendant would not have prevailed on a motion to suppress if one had been filed on the merits, either. United States v. Pierce, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19353 (W.D. N.Y. Feb. 7, 2019).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s oversearching claim for searching his camper is rejected because the search warrant permitted it. People v. Madigan<\/a>, 2019 NY Slip Op 00999, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 998 (4th Dept. Feb. 9, 2019).*<\/p>\n In an alleged sex offense, there was probable cause shown to seize bedding and clothing for DNA. State v. Shannon<\/a>, 2019-Ohio-421, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 438 (11th Dist. Feb. 8, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant disavowed any connection at trial to a particular house as a trial strategy. Thus, it was not ineffective assistance of counsel for not moving to suppress the search of a house he thus lacked standing in\u2013defendant would not have … Continue reading