This investigation into a stolen car ring operated from a home garage showed nexus to the house, too. \u201cThe affidavit by Officer Chappell is clear and thorough and reflects months of information gathering. The affidavit explains the nexus between the focal point of the investigation \u2014 the allegations of a stolen car ring being operated out of the garage \u2014 and the request to search the house. First, the affidavit details the repeated visits by persons of interest and the contents of the trash-pulls. Second, the affidavit contemplates that indicia of the conspiracy \u2014 documents, papers, books, records, currency counters, and so on \u2014 would be located in the house, and the search warrant details these indicia specifically.\u201d In addition, listing firearms didn\u2019t make the search warrant overbroad. United States v. Peterson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1833 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 4, 2019).<\/p>\n
Slight inconsistencies in the testimony of two officers about how the stop occurred didn\u2019t so undermine their testimony that they were incredible and couldn\u2019t be believed. United States v. Flippo<\/a>, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 376 (11th Cir. Jan. 7, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" This investigation into a stolen car ring operated from a home garage showed nexus to the house, too. \u201cThe affidavit by Officer Chappell is clear and thorough and reflects months of information gathering. The affidavit explains the nexus between the … Continue reading