Defendant abandoned child pornography by secreting it with a cell phone in a briefcase in his attic. After he sold the house, he left it behind. He says he instructed a friend to retrieve it, but that didn\u2019t happen. On the totality, this was an abandonment. United States v. Fisher, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218410 (D. Nev. Dec. 14, 2018), adopted, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1921 (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2019).<\/p>\n
Petitioner\u2019s habeas claim wasn\u2019t timely. \u201cMoreover, Owens’s application shows that he was suspicious of the informant’s reliability and aware that the affidavit in support of the search was allegedly insufficient to establish probable cause before he pleaded guilty. Accordingly, Owen’s second claim does not satisfy \u00a7 2244(b)(2)(B).\u201d In re Owens, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 263 (6th Cir. Jan. 4, 2019).* <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant abandoned child pornography by secreting it with a cell phone in a briefcase in his attic. After he sold the house, he left it behind. He says he instructed a friend to retrieve it, but that didn\u2019t happen. On … Continue reading