Defendant has no standing in another person\u2019s vehicle. He provided no affidavit of ownership, and he relies solely on a wiretap where he talked about it being his and he would provide clear title to it. \u201cStanding is based on actual, not purported, ownership. Gonzalez offers (and the Court finds) no authority for the proposition that one may obtain an expectation of privacy in a truck, which society is prepared to honor, simply by misleading others into believing that he might have a proprietary interest in it.\u201d United States v. Gonzalez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217372 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 19, 2018). <\/p>\n
Another codefendant didn\u2019t show standing either. United States v. Gonzalez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217375 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 28, 2018).* <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant has no standing in another person\u2019s vehicle. He provided no affidavit of ownership, and he relies solely on a wiretap where he talked about it being his and he would provide clear title to it. \u201cStanding is based on … Continue reading