Defendant\u2019s calls on a contraband cell phone in jail were wiretapped. He doesn\u2019t even have standing because the phone was unlawful. \u201cThe cases concerning the precise question at issue\u2014a prisoner’s ability to challenge the introduction of intercepted communications from his contraband cell phone\u2014are unanimous in rejecting the argument Allen advances here. Such challenges are not sanctioned by Title III, particularly when it is read in conjunction with the federal statute criminalizing inmates’ possession of cell phones.\u201d United States v. Allen, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202503 (S.D. Ga. Nov. 30, 2018).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s calls on a contraband cell phone in jail were wiretapped. He doesn\u2019t even have standing because the phone was unlawful. \u201cThe cases concerning the precise question at issue\u2014a prisoner’s ability to challenge the introduction of intercepted communications from his … Continue reading