A person on supervised release was subject to a search condition of his residence. That did not include places he was visiting. Search of his backpack suppressed; a search warrant was required to even enter the premises of a third party. United States v. Roehr, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202549 (D. Mont. Nov. 30, 2018).<\/p>\n
Seven co-defendants join in one defendant\u2019s motion to suppress the search of his car. They don\u2019t have standing. United States v. Gonzalez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202985 (D. Nev. Nov. 30, 2018).*<\/p>\n
On a detention motion, the court considers the search issue as well, and nothing is apparent that the search is bad. The weight of the evidence is great. United States v. Ramos-Castillo, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202970 (D. N.M. Nov. 30, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A person on supervised release was subject to a search condition of his residence. That did not include places he was visiting. Search of his backpack suppressed; a search warrant was required to even enter the premises of a third … Continue reading