A state court judge issued a ping order and the phone crossed state lines. Was it a tracking order or an SCA order? \u201cThe Court sees no need to venture further into the quagmire of tracking devices, the SCA, and jurisdictional authority to issue warrants because even if the warrants were issued contrary to law, the good faith exception applies. See Leon, 468 U.S. at 913. \u2018[T]he exclusionary rule does not apply when the police conduct a search in \u201cobjectively reasonable reliance\u201d on a warrant later held invalid.\u2019 Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229, 239, 131 S. Ct. 2419, 180 L. Ed. 2d 285 (2011) (quoting Leon, 468 U.S. at 922).\u201d United States v. Gutierrez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191259 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 8, 2018).<\/p>\n
Defendant didn\u2019t show that the third party\u2019s consent was invalid or that the plain view didn\u2019t apply. Stuart-Holt v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191268 (D.N.H. Nov. 8, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A state court judge issued a ping order and the phone crossed state lines. Was it a tracking order or an SCA order? \u201cThe Court sees no need to venture further into the quagmire of tracking devices, the SCA, and … Continue reading