\u201cGiven the scope and pervasiveness of the fraud alleged, the search warrant issued for Ms. Natysin’s home was not overly broad.\u201d \u201cThis finding is supported in part by the fact the affidavit accompanied the warrant to the search and was available for officers conducting the search to refer to. This affidavit helps further define the \u2018overarching purpose of the search,\u2019 which was to discover evidence related to a well-defined fraudulent wire transfer scheme. See id. The fact that the warrant permitted seizure of items maintained or stored by Ms. Natysin’s husband does not render the warrant overbroad in this circumstance, where the fraud alleged is widespread and where fraudulent payments were concealed by being made to bank accounts owned by Ms. Natysin’s husband.\u201d United States v. Natysin, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165364 (D. Minn. Aug. 27, 2018), adopted, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164911 (D. Minn. Sep. 26, 2018).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cGiven the scope and pervasiveness of the fraud alleged, the search warrant issued for Ms. Natysin’s home was not overly broad.\u201d \u201cThis finding is supported in part by the fact the affidavit accompanied the warrant to the search and was … Continue reading