CIs gave information that they bought drugs from a guy with a burner phone, and the phone was ultimately linked to defendant. Based on collective knowledge, the police had sufficient information for reasonable suspicion to stop and detain defendant. Defendant wasn\u2019t legally under arrest until the burner phone rang during the detention showing again that he was really the guy. United States v. Conley, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160511 (D. Conn. Sep. 20, 2018).<\/p>\n
Defendant was stopped for 55 in a 30 and that was a basis for his stop. Dispatch advised he was a chronic FTA. Under the department policy, an inventory was required, and there were firearms seized from the vehicle. United States v. Edmisten, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160977 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 20, 2018).*<\/p>\n
2255 COA denied. Defense counsel did in fact argue a Fourth Amendment issue and lost because it was meritless. Reasonable jurists wouldn\u2019t disagree. Hudson v. United States, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 26831 (11th Cir. Sep. 19, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
CIs gave information that they bought drugs from a guy with a burner phone, and the phone was ultimately linked to defendant. Based on collective knowledge, the police had sufficient information for reasonable suspicion to stop and detain defendant. Defendant … Continue reading