Defendant had standing as a guest in Commonwealth subsidized housing. The record wasn\u2019t clear on how long he stayed there in total, but clearly at the time of the search. The occupant\u2019s lease prohibited extended stay guests, but it also isn\u2019t clear what that means or that defendant even knew there was a limit. But, despite his standing, he loses on the merits of the search. He was a wanted dangerous person, and they knew he was there. The entry was reasonable. United States v. Torres-Viruet, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153256 (D. P.R. Sep. 7, 2018).*<\/p>\n
Citizen call to police of a man with a gun in his lap at a strip mall \u201cwith loud behavior\u201d was reasonable suspicion when the vehicle was seen. State v. Laster<\/a>, 2018-Ohio-3601, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 3898 (2d Dist. Sep. 7, 2018)*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant had standing as a guest in Commonwealth subsidized housing. The record wasn\u2019t clear on how long he stayed there in total, but clearly at the time of the search. The occupant\u2019s lease prohibited extended stay guests, but it also … Continue reading