{"id":3451,"date":"2011-01-11T17:31:50","date_gmt":"2009-10-19T08:35:14","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2009-10-19T08:35:14","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3451","title":{"rendered":"TN: Arbitrary parole searches would be invalid, but this one wasn&#8217;t"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tennessee discusses parole and probation searches at length and concludes this one is valid. It also recognizes that arbitrary searches would not be valid. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tsc.state.tn.us\/OPINIONS\/tsc\/PDF\/094\/SC%20State%20v%20Charlotte%20Yvonne%20Turner%20OPN.pdf\">State v. Turner<\/a>, 297 S.W.3d 155 (Tenn. 2009):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>While we agree that these are appropriate factors to consider when reviewing whether a warrantless and suspicionless search of a parolee is unreasonable and therefore unconstitutional, we also recognize that a suspicionless search could be characterized as &#8220;arbitrary.&#8221; See Black&#8217;s Law Dictionary 112 (8th ed. 2004) (&#8220;1. Depending on individual discretion &#8230;.&#8221;). A search of this type is not necessarily unreasonable, however. Therefore, the totality of the circumstances surrounding a warrantless, suspicionless search of a parolee must be examined to determine whether the search is constitutionally unreasonable. For example, a pattern of repetitive searches while the parolee is at work or asleep would be unreasonable. Searches intended to cause the parolee some harm would be unreasonable. A search conducted out of personal animosity would be unreasonable. Indeed, there may be other situations where a warrantless, suspicionless search of a parolee is unreasonable. A suspicionless search of a parolee subject to a warrantless search condition, and which is conducted out of valid law enforcement concerns, is not unreasonable.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>A NY parole officer could look in defendant\u2019s room when he showed up for a parole search and defendant was disheveled and kind of out of it and a lamp was topped over on the floor which created a fire hazard.  United States v. Santalucia, 666 F. Supp. 2d 268 (N.D. N.Y. 2009).*<\/p>\n<p>Defense counsel withdrew defendant&#8217;s motion to suppress. On this record, the court could not consider an IAC claim. Defendant can do that in a 2255. <a href=\"http:\/\/pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov\/opinion.pdf\/084408.U.pdf\">United States v. Cooper<\/a>, 346 Fed. Appx. 962 (4th Cir. 2009) (unpublished).*<\/p>\n<p>In an administrative DL suspension for DUI in Idaho the driver has the burden of showing that the stop was illegal. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.isc.idaho.gov\/opinions\/Wheeler-opn.pdf\">Wheeler v. Idaho Transp. Dep&#8217;t<\/a>, 148 Idaho 378, 223 P.3d 761 (App. 2009), Released for Publication January 28, 2010, Review denied by Wheeler v. Idaho Transp. Dep&#8217;t, 2010 Ida. LEXIS 29 (Idaho, Jan. 26, 2010). (Note:  The Fourth Amendment requires the government bear the burden of proof and going forward in a warrantless stop and search. How could they get it so wrong?)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3451\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3451","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3451","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3451"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3451\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3451"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3451"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3451"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}