{"id":33906,"date":"2018-07-17T07:21:43","date_gmt":"2018-07-17T12:21:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=33906"},"modified":"2018-07-17T07:21:43","modified_gmt":"2018-07-17T12:21:43","slug":"ca1-franks-challenge-fails-to-undermine-pc-alternative-scenario-was-implausible","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=33906","title":{"rendered":"CA1: Franks challenge fails to undermine PC; alternative scenario was &#8220;implausible&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant posited much information that was omitted from the affidavit for the search warrant, but that would have created an implausible scenario that didn\u2019t even make sense to the appeals court. \u201cEven if we assume that the challenged statements and omissions were either deliberate or reckless \u2014 a matter that we need not reach \u2014 it is clear that correcting the defendant&#8217;s weight and adding in the omitted information would not have vitiated the finding of probable cause. Neither the alleged misstatement about the defendant&#8217;s weight nor the omitted information was critical to the finding of probable cause.\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/media.ca1.uscourts.gov\/pdf.opinions\/17-1284P-01A.pdf\">United States v. Barbosa<\/a>, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 19498 (1st Cir. July 16, 2018).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDespite the R&#038;R&#8217;s correct conclusion that probable cause supported each of the warrants, the Defendant&#8217;s Objections attempt to attack the existence of probable cause through speculation and supposition.\u201d Defendant\u2019s Franks challenge because of omission of details about the CI essentially is speculation. United States v. Crawford, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116159 (E.D. Ky. July 12, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant posited much information that was omitted from the affidavit for the search warrant, but that would have created an implausible scenario that didn\u2019t even make sense to the appeals court. \u201cEven if we assume that the challenged statements and &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=33906\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33906","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-franks-doctrine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33906","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=33906"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33906\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33907,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33906\/revisions\/33907"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=33906"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=33906"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=33906"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}