Plaintiff was legally blind but owned her car. She was a passenger in the back seat. After the vehicle was stopped, the officer found a warrant for a person with the same name as her. She protested she wasn\u2019t the one. He took her in, causing her pain and to collapse during the arrest process. After a few hours, the fax confirmation of the warrant came in and it was for a 20 year younger white woman, and plaintiff is African-American. In a Bivens action, the officer gets qualified immunity. The fact the name was the same was enough. Williams v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115005 (D. Md. July 11, 2018).*<\/p>\n
The alleged material omissions, if supplied, still leaves probable cause for the search warrant. United States v. Charles<\/a>, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 18964 (8th Cir. July 12, 2018).*<\/p>\n Guilty plea waived appeal of denial of suppression motion. People v. Brown<\/a>, 2018 NY Slip Op 05188, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5079 (2d Dept. July 12, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Plaintiff was legally blind but owned her car. She was a passenger in the back seat. After the vehicle was stopped, the officer found a warrant for a person with the same name as her. She protested she wasn\u2019t the … Continue reading